Sharon Lauchaire Interim Director of Communications | New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety
Sharon Lauchaire Interim Director of Communications | New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety
Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin has announced that the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights (DCR) has found probable cause in ten cases related to alleged housing discrimination against individuals receiving rental assistance. These cases, spread across seven counties in New Jersey, involve claims that landlords denied rental opportunities or failed to complete necessary documentation for applicants receiving rental aid.
Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD), it is illegal for landlords to refuse rentals based on a tenant's source of lawful income, including government or third-party rental assistance. The recent findings target property owners and managers accused of such discriminatory practices.
"We are dedicated to protecting New Jerseyans’ right to use government rental assistance to access affordable housing," stated Attorney General Platkin. He emphasized that refusing rentals due to rental assistance violates state law and reaffirmed efforts to hold violators accountable.
Sundeep Iyer, Director of the Division on Civil Rights, highlighted the importance of addressing housing discrimination as a priority for 2024. "Rental assistance plays a critical role in enabling many New Jerseyans to access safe, stable housing," he said, reiterating DCR's commitment to enforcing anti-discrimination laws.
In one case from Mount Laurel, a complainant was allegedly ignored by a landlord after disclosing her use of rental assistance and an emotional support animal. When contacted later without mentioning these details, the landlord initially scheduled an appointment but then withdrew availability upon learning about them again.
Another case involved property owners in Somerdale who reportedly ceased communication with an applicant after discovering their intent to use rental aid. Upon re-contacting with different credentials, the applicant was informed that rental assistance would not be accepted.
Some landlords claimed misunderstandings regarding Section 8 voucher requirements or eligibility issues as reasons for their actions. However, these findings do not conclude guilt but indicate sufficient evidence suggesting potential LAD violations. The cases will proceed through conciliation attempts before possible legal prosecution if unresolved.
The DCR continues its mission against discrimination across employment, housing, and public accommodations statewide.
Alerts Sign-up